What is an Intrusion Detection System (IDS)?

An Intrusion Detection System (IDS) serves as an early warning system, notifying Security Operations Center (SOC) analysts of potential incidents. This empowers them to conduct thorough investigations and decide on the need for additional actions.

How Does IDS Work?

  • Monitors network traffic for suspicious activity
  • Analyzes network data to detect abnormal patterns or behavior
  • Employs predefined rules and patterns to compare and identify potential attacks or intrusions
  • Alerts the system administrator upon detection
  • Enables the administrator to investigate and take action to prevent damage or further intrusion

Why Are Intrusion Detection Systems Important?

Threat Detection

IDS are vital for proactive threat detection. They continuously monitor network traffic and data, scrutinizing for irregular patterns or activities that might indicate a security breach. This early warning system allows organizations to identify potential threats at an early stage before they escalate into more serious security incidents.

In doing so, IDS contributes to reducing the dwell time of threats, ensuring that security teams can respond swiftly and effectively to mitigate risks. By providing timely alerts to security personnel, IDS assists in maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of sensitive data.

Security Posture

Additionally, IDS serve as a critical layer of defense, complementing other security measures like firewalls and antivirus software. IDS not only detects potential threats but also facilitates forensic analysis, helping organizations understand attack methods, vulnerabilities, and areas that require further fortification. Also, their role in regulatory compliance cannot be understated.

Many industries and sectors are subject to stringent data protection regulations. Implementing IDS is often a prerequisite for meeting compliance requirements, which is essential for avoiding legal repercussions and protecting an organization’s reputation.

Types of Intrusion Detection Systems

Intrusion Detection Systems come in various forms, each tailored to detect and prevent security threats in specific environments or at distinct levels of an IT infrastructure as follows:

NIDS (Network Intrusion Detection Systems)

Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) focus on monitoring network traffic to identify suspicious activity or potential threats. Placed at strategic points within the network, NIDS examines data packets for signs of intrusion, unauthorized access, or other malicious behavior.

These systems are particularly valuable in safeguarding a network’s perimeter, identifying external threats, and providing valuable insights for network security management.

HIDS (Host-Based Intrusion Detection Systems)

Host-Based Intrusion Detection Systems (HIDS) operate at the individual device level, closely examining system logs and files on servers and endpoints. HIDS are instrumental in detecting threats that originate within the network, such as insider attacks or compromised devices. They are well-suited for protecting critical servers and endpoints, offering granular visibility into the security of each host.

Protocol-Based Intrusion Detection System (PIDS)

Protocol-Based Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDS) specialize in monitoring network protocols and identifying deviations from established norms. These systems are particularly useful in detecting anomalies within the underlying communication protocols of a network. PIDS can help pinpoint unusual activities or protocol-specific attacks that might go unnoticed by other types of IDS.

Application Protocol-Based Intrusion Detection System (APIDS)

Application Protocol-Based Intrusion Detection Systems (APIDS) provide a deeper level of scrutiny by focusing on the protocols used by specific applications. They analyze the application layer of network traffic to identify deviations in protocol usage, which can be indicative of attacks targeting specific applications. APIDS are valuable in protecting critical applications and services against sophisticated attacks.

Hybrid Intrusion Detection System

Hybrid Intrusion Detection Systems combine elements of both NIDS and HIDS to offer comprehensive threat detection capabilities. These systems provide a holistic approach to security, addressing threats at the network level while also safeguarding individual hosts. Hybrids are versatile and can be tailored to specific organizational needs, making them an attractive choice for organizations looking for a balanced approach to security.

Types of IDS Methods

Intrusion Detection System (IDS) methods are diverse, serving as essential tools for identifying and mitigating security threats:

Signature-Based IDS

Signature-based IDS relies on predefined patterns or signatures of known threats. It compares network or system activity to a database of these signatures and triggers an alert when a match is detected. This method is effective in identifying well-known threats but may struggle with zero-day attacks or novel vulnerabilities.

  • Advantages: Rapid detection of known threats, low false positive rates, and simplicity of operation.
  • Limitations: Vulnerable to zero-day attacks and emerging threats, may miss novel attack patterns, and require frequent signature updates.

Anomaly-Based IDS

Anomaly-based IDS takes a different approach by establishing a baseline of normal network or system behavior. It then identifies deviations from this baseline, flagging any activity that is statistically unusual or suspicious. This method excels at detecting previously unseen threats, making it valuable for safeguarding against emerging risks.

  • Advantages: Ability to detect novel and emerging threats, adaptability to changing network conditions, and lower false positive rates for certain use cases.
  • Limitations: Can be complex to configure, may generate false alerts in dynamic environments, and require fine-tuning to minimize false positives.

Stateful Protocol Analysis Detection

Stateful Protocol Analysis Detection, also known as Stateful IDS, closely inspects network traffic and system events to track the state of active connections. It maintains knowledge of the protocol states and flags any deviations or violations. This method provides in-depth contextual analysis and is effective in identifying attacks that exploit the intricacies of network protocols.

Hybrid Intrusion Detection

Hybrid Intrusion Detection Systems combine the strengths of both Signature-Based and Anomaly-Based IDS. These systems use signature matching to identify known threats while simultaneously monitoring for deviations from the established baseline.

By incorporating elements of both detection methods, they offer a balanced approach to threat detection, providing the flexibility to detect both well-known and emerging threats.

  • Advantages: Comprehensive threat detection capabilities, adaptability to a wide range of threats, and a balanced approach to security.
  • Limitations: May require more resources than single-method IDS, can be complex to implement, and must be well-tuned for optimal performance.

Advantages of IDS

Intrusion Detection Systems offer a host of benefits in the realm of cybersecurity and network management:

Malicious Activity Detection

One of the primary advantages of IDS is their ability to detect malicious activities and security breaches in real-time. By continuously monitoring network traffic and system behavior, IDS can promptly identify unauthorized access, suspicious patterns, and potential threats, enabling swift responses to mitigate risks and minimize the impact of security incidents. This proactive threat detection is instrumental in safeguarding an organization’s digital assets and ensuring uninterrupted business operations.

Network Performance Improvement

Beyond security, IDS can contribute to enhancing network performance. By analyzing and optimizing the flow of data, IDS can help in identifying and resolving bottlenecks, reducing latency, and ensuring smoother network operation. This dual functionality of maintaining security while also improving network performance underscores the versatility and value of IDS in modern IT environments.

Meeting Compliance Requirements

IDS plays a pivotal role in compliance by providing detailed event logs, alerts, and reports, which are essential for demonstrating compliance with industry standards and regulations. Whether it’s HIPAA, GDPR, or industry-specific requirements, IDS assists organizations in adhering to these regulations, thereby avoiding legal issues and safeguarding their reputation.

Providing Insights into Network Traffic

IDS offers a wealth of information about network traffic patterns, user behaviors, and system vulnerabilities. By analyzing this data, organizations gain valuable insights into their network’s health and potential areas of improvement.

These insights can inform strategic decision-making, resource allocation, and risk mitigation strategies, ensuring that the network operates optimally and securely while adapting to evolving threats and demands.

Looking For Enhanced Firewall Security?

Limitations of IDS

Intrusion Detection Systems are invaluable, but they also come with inherent limitations:

Noise Can Limit Their Effectiveness

One limitation of IDS is their susceptibility to noise, the influx of non-threatening data that can overwhelm the system. When the IDS is inundated with excessive data, it can struggle to distinguish genuine threats from benign activities, potentially leading to overlooked security risks and a reduced capacity to respond effectively.

A Lot of False Alarms

False alarms are a common drawback of IDS, causing an inundation of alerts that demand valuable time and resources to investigate. These erroneous notifications can erode trust in the system, leading to security personnel becoming desensitized to alerts and potentially missing genuine threats amidst the noise.

The Need to Update Software Often

To remain effective, IDS requires frequent updates to their signature databases and rule sets. The dynamic nature of threats means that ongoing maintenance and timely updates are essential. Failure to update these databases can render the IDS vulnerable to new and emerging threats, compromising its ability to detect and mitigate evolving security risks.

Don’t Compensate for Weak Authentication Mechanisms

IDS are limited in their ability to address vulnerabilities stemming from weak or compromised authentication mechanisms. While they can detect unauthorized access attempts or suspicious activities, they cannot rectify the root cause of these vulnerabilities. Strengthening authentication mechanisms remains an essential component of overall security strategies.

Don’t (Usually) Process Encrypted Packages

The encryption of network traffic poses a challenge for IDS, as it impedes their ability to analyze the content of encrypted packages. While they can detect anomalies in encrypted traffic, the IDS cannot delve into the encrypted data, potentially missing threats concealed within encrypted communication. This limitation underscores the importance of other security measures in conjunction with IDS to address encrypted traffic effectively.

Common IDS Evasion Techniques

Intrusion Detection Systems are essential components of network security, but malicious actors continuously develop techniques to evade their detection as follows:


One prevalent IDS evasion technique involves packet fragmentation, where attackers break down malicious data into smaller fragments. This fragmentation can trick the IDS, as it may not fully reassemble and inspect the packets, allowing malicious content to pass through undetected. This method capitalizes on the inherent limitations of IDS in handling fragmented data, enabling attackers to exploit network vulnerabilities.

Avoiding Defaults

Attackers often attempt to avoid triggering IDS alerts by steering clear of well-known attack signatures and default configurations. By crafting custom attack patterns and using non-standard ports, they reduce the likelihood of being identified by signature-based IDS. This technique necessitates the use of more advanced IDS methods, such as anomaly detection, to detect unusual or non-standard behavior.

Coordinated, Low-Bandwidth Attacks

Some attackers employ a strategy of coordinating low-bandwidth attacks, such as distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks with minimal traffic rates, to bypass IDS detection. These attacks aim to fly under the radar by staying below detection thresholds. While each attack may not trigger alerts, their cumulative effect can still have a disruptive impact. IDS must adapt to identify and mitigate these subtle yet coordinated threats effectively.

Address Spoofing or Proxying

Address spoofing and proxying are tactics used to conceal the true source of attacks. By manipulating packet headers or routing traffic through multiple intermediary servers, attackers can obscure their origin, making it difficult for IDS to trace the malicious activity back to its source. Detecting such evasion techniques often requires advanced threat intelligence and traffic analysis tools.

Pattern Change Evasion

Malicious actors frequently employ pattern change evasion, where they subtly modify attack patterns to evade IDS that rely on static patterns or signatures for detection. This method involves altering attack payloads or tactics in ways that can evade signature-based IDS and make it challenging for the system to recognize and respond to the threat effectively.

Security practitioners must continually update IDS rules and leverage more adaptive methods to combat evolving attack patterns.

IDS vs Firewalls

In network security, Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and firewalls are two fundamental components, each with distinct roles and functions. While they share the common goal of safeguarding network infrastructure, they operate at different levels of the security hierarchy.


Firewalls serve as the first line of defense by establishing a barrier between a trusted internal network and untrusted external sources, controlling the flow of traffic based on predefined rules and policies. They primarily focus on filtering and permitting or denying incoming and outgoing traffic based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols.

Firewalls are akin to security checkpoints, and they operate proactively to prevent unauthorized access, offering a strong level of network perimeter protection. However, they are less effective at identifying and responding to subtle internal threats or detecting specific patterns of attacks within permitted traffic.


In contrast, Intrusion Detection Systems work as vigilant sentinels that continuously monitor network and system activities, scrutinizing for signs of malicious behavior, unauthorized access, or potential security breaches. IDS operates reactively and identifies patterns of behavior that deviate from predefined norms.

They provide in-depth visibility into network activity, which is particularly valuable for identifying emerging threats and internal risks. IDS can send alerts to security teams when they detect suspicious activity, enabling timely responses to mitigate security incidents.

While they offer a deeper level of insight into network behavior, IDS do not actively block traffic; their primary role is detection and reporting, leaving the action-taking to security administrators.

In essence, firewalls and IDS complement each other in a comprehensive security strategy. Firewalls establish the initial perimeter defense, ensuring that unauthorized traffic is kept at bay. IDS, on the other hand, focuses on monitoring and detecting deviations within the allowed traffic, thus providing critical insights into ongoing security threats.

To maximize network security, organizations often deploy both firewalls and IDS in tandem, creating a layered security approach that defends against a wide range of external and internal threats.

Looking for a Firewall as a Service?


What is an example of an intrusion system?
An example of a Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) installation could involve placing it on the subnet where firewalls are positioned to monitor attempts to breach the firewall’s security. While it’s ideal to scan all incoming and outgoing traffic, this comprehensive monitoring may potentially result in a bottleneck that could negatively impact the network’s overall performance.
What is the difference between IDS and IPS?
An Intrusion Detection System (IDS) primarily serves to raise an alert upon detecting a potential security incident. This alert then empowers a Security Operations Center (SOC) analyst to conduct a thorough investigation and decide if additional measures are necessary. Conversely, an Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) proactively takes action, autonomously blocking intrusion attempts or initiating incident resolution without manual intervention.

Looking for a Top-Notch Firewall Solution?

Supercharge your Firewall Security today with Perimeter 81.